Problems with -me macros

Article View: comp.text

Article #3434

#3434

From: tgm
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 1987 15:19

16 lines
1257 bytes


Has anybody out there had any problems with the me macros and ditroff?
We're running ditroff with version 2.15 of the me package, and the vertical
spacing it produces is far too small, and the lines overlap each other in the
final text. I don't think it's ditroff, as the ms and man packages work
fine. Has anyone had this problem, or know of a fix?

Please e-mail me directly, as we're not currently receiving news.
Thanks,
     Hugh Grant                   UUCP: seismo!ukc!tcdmath!hugh

P.S   Please forgive me if this appears twice -- I've had to pad at 1200
      baud to a different country to  get this news connection,
     and I may have sent it twice  by mistake as the line-editing isn't
     too great :-)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <2509@eagle.ukc.ac.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!seismo!mcvax!ukc!tgm

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!seismo!mcvax!ukc!tgm
From: tgm@ukc.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.text,comp.unix.wizards,comp.bugs.2bsd
Subject: Problems with  -me macros
Message-ID: <2509@eagle.ukc.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 16-Feb-87 10:19:21 EST
Article-I.D.: eagle.2509
Posted: Mon Feb 16 10:19:21 1987
Date-Received: Wed, 18-Feb-87 19:44:59 EST
Reply-To: tgm@ukc.ac.uk (T.Murphy)
Organization: U of Kent at Canterbury, Canterbury, UK
Lines: 16