Re: problem with Common TeX?

Article View: comp.text

Article #4359

#4359

From: I.A.Utting
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1988 09:51

38 lines
1245 bytes

Expires:

Sender:

Followup-To:


In article <400@sering.cwi.nl> denise@cwi.nl writes:
>We have Common TeX, Version 2.1, and it doesn't seem to work.
>input:
>	Hello, world
>	\bye
>log file output:
>	This is Common TeX, .....
>	**foo  
>	(./foo.tex
>	Runaway definition?
>	->
>	! Forbidden control sequence found while scanning definition of \blort.
[ etc. ]

I too have seen this. I guess that you're using the following sequence to
generate an "undump"ed version of TeX:
	% virtex
	This is Common TeX, .....
	**&plain \read 0 to \blort
	\blort=^\
Due (I suspect) to differences between the i/o characteristics of Pascal and
C, you should try:
	% virtex
	This is Common TeX, .....
	**&plain
	*\^
Where \^ is your quit character in both cases.

This has left me with a working Common TeX.
					Ian Utting.
					iau@ukc.uucp or iau@ukc.ac.uk

Technical Details

Message-ID: <4215@eagle.ukc.ac.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!mcvax!ukc!eagle!iau

References: <400@sering.cwi.nl>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!mcvax!ukc!eagle!iau
From: iau@eagle.ukc.ac.uk (I.A.Utting)
Newsgroups: comp.text
Subject: Re: problem with Common TeX?
Message-ID: <4215@eagle.ukc.ac.uk>
Date: 21 Jan 88 09:51:39 GMT
References: <400@sering.cwi.nl>
Reply-To: iau@ukc.ac.uk (I.A.Utting)
Organization: Computing Lab, University of Kent at Canterbury, UK.
Lines: 31

Reply to Parent Message