Article View: comp.text
Article #4623Re: CTeX and DOS or XENIX or Microport
From: Phil C. Miller
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 1988 19:57
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 1988 19:57
25 lines
1563 bytes
1563 bytes
In article <7314@dhw68k.cts.com> phil@dhw68k.cts.com (Phil Suematsu) writes: >In article <377@mancol.UUCP> samperi@mancol.UUCP (Dominick Samperi) writes: >>I've been trying to get CTeX 2.9 running under DOS or Xenix or Microport. Great, I have been wondering recently if such a thing exists, mostly since starting a job where the predominant text processor is LATeX. >I assume you are working with Common TeX 2.9, and not CTeX (CTeX is >not Common TeX). Wow, there's more than one! >I don't want to release diffs to the net quite yet, because I have >not had the opportunity to fully test the modified Common TeX. Diffs? Where does one get the original source code? >It is possible that someone out there >has a Common TeX 2.9 working under MS-DOS which has already been >torture tested. It would be better to post diffs from that source >rather than from my untested version. If it doesn't cause a lawsuit or an apoplectic fit from Unix SysAdmins, could someone post the source or at least some information about how to obtain Common TeX?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3422@omepd>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!hplabs!hp-pcd!uoregon!omepd!pcmReferences:
<377@mancol.UUCP> <7314@dhw68k.cts.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!hplabs!hp-pcd!uoregon!omepd!pcm From: pcm@iwarpv.intel.com (Phil C. Miller) Newsgroups: comp.text,comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Re: CTeX and DOS or XENIX or Microport Message-ID: <3422@omepd> Date: 28 Apr 88 19:57:47 GMT References: <377@mancol.UUCP> <7314@dhw68k.cts.com> Sender: news@omepd Reply-To: pcm@iwarpv.UUCP (Phil C. Miller) Organization: Intel Corp., Hillsboro Lines: 24 Keywords: Common TeX 2.9, PC-DOS