🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <2882@hubcap.UUCP> billwolf@hubcap.clemson.edu writes:
>> I also question the human engineering of forms that put the year first.
>> It is consistent, and in some sense elegant, but it is poorly adapted to
>> human needs.  The most important information should be first.  For most
>> uses of dates, that is the day number, followed by the month.
>
>     Ah, I see... Tell me, do you think your odometer should present
>     the last two digits first, then some verbal representation of
>     the next-to-last two digits, followed by the remaining digits?

Since the number on an odometer is simply a kilometer/mile number, with
no significant internal structure, the analogy is invalid.  If mileage
were given as a <country, state, county, miles> tuple, would you want
the state displayed as a name or a number?

>     If you REALLY want to question methods of presenting time, why
>     not investigate the asinine 12-hour format used in the United
>     States?  The 24-hour, European standard is MUCH more sensible...

Well, personally I use the 24-hour form whenever possible.
-- 
Intel CPUs are not defective,  |     Henry Spencer at U of Toronto Zoology
they just act that way.        | uunet!attcan!utzoo!henry henry@zoo.toronto.edu