Article View: comp.text
Article #5215Re: fig as standard?
From: Conrad &
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 1988 06:06
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 1988 06:06
38 lines
2686 bytes
2686 bytes
In article <3562@boulder.Colorado.EDU> hartzell@boulder.Colorado.EDU (George Hartzell) writes:
I have some undergraduate students who are going to work on a simple
package for doing x-y graphs and histograms. Ultimately there will be a
menu driven interface, a batch and/or custom (pic like) language
interface, and a library of routines that can be used for other
applications. It seems to me that there are now several graphics
editors that use the "fig format", so it makes sense to me to use it if
possible. This has the advantage that other people have already written
the translators, etc... What I don't know is whether there are any
significant drawbacks to using it. Some degree of device independence
is important (different flavors of laser printers, etc...), and it is
important that we be able to include these figures in troff and TeX
documents.
The fig format itself is quite feasible but the fig programs (FIG 1.4,
FIG 1.4-TFX or xfig) do not understand or use all the parameters. For
example, the fig file created by the fig programs always set the
resolution to 80 dpi. I don't think they can handle any resolution
other than 80 dpi (or they may just ignore that field). However, 80
dpi may not be sufficient for drawing graphs. On the other hand, I
believe most programs in Transfig can handle any resolution. A graph
drawing program may have to operate in two modes. A draft mode to create
a fig file in 80 dpi such that it can be previewed or edited by
fig programs and a high resolution mode to create fig file for final output.
I have found the transfig package (from june.cs.washington.edu), which
has some documentation about the fig stuff. Is there anything else that
I would find helpful. Does anyone have any helpful hints?
The latest version of Transfig can be found on svax.cs.cornell.edu.
This version includes support for TFX (TransFig eXtension) and fig2epic.
--Conrad
internet: kwok@iris.ucdavis.edu
csnet: kwok@ucd.csnet
csnet: kwok%iris.ucdavis.edu@csnet.relay
uucp: {ucbvax, uunet, ... }!ucdavis!iris!kwok
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<KWOK.88Sep22230635@iris.ucdavis.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!ucdavis!ucdavis.ucdavis.edu!kwokReferences:
<3562@boulder.Colorado.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!ucdavis!ucdavis.ucdavis.edu!kwok From: kwok@iris.ucdavis.edu (Conrad &) Newsgroups: comp.text Subject: Re: fig as standard? Message-ID: <KWOK.88Sep22230635@iris.ucdavis.edu> Date: 23 Sep 88 06:06:35 GMT References: <3562@boulder.Colorado.EDU> Sender: uucp@ucdavis.ucdavis.edu Distribution: na Organization: University of California at Davis. Lines: 38 In-reply-to: hartzell@boulder.Colorado.EDU's message of 19 Sep 88 22:22:01 GMT