Article View: comp.text
Article #5261Re: WYSIWYG vs programmed phototypsetti
From: L.KELLEY
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 1988 15:33
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 1988 15:33
12 lines
921 bytes
921 bytes
In article <47700025@uxe.cso.uiuc.edu>, mcdonald@uxe.cso.uiuc.edu writes: > >Niether of these are always true. With the Mac at least, the screen > >cannot come close to displaying what will go one when you print your > >document to a laser printer, so WSYWIG is a misnomer. Also, most Mac > >processors are so painfully slow at doing anything substantial that it > >isn't worth bothering. > Have you seen or tried the Interleaf system on a Sun workstation? It looks pretty good. Linda Kelley
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<914@lzfme.att.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!seismo!sundc!pitstop!sun!decwrl!labrea!rutgers!att!mtuxo!lzfme!llkReferences:
<1141@mmm.UUCP> <47700025@uxe.cso.uiuc.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!seismo!sundc!pitstop!sun!decwrl!labrea!rutgers!att!mtuxo!lzfme!llk From: llk@lzfme.att.com (L.KELLEY) Newsgroups: comp.text Subject: Re: WYSIWYG vs programmed phototypsetti Summary: Interleaf on the Sun workstation Message-ID: <914@lzfme.att.com> Date: 30 Sep 88 15:33:15 GMT References: <1141@mmm.UUCP> <47700025@uxe.cso.uiuc.edu> Organization: AT&T, Lincroft NJ Lines: 12