Article View: comp.text
Article #5466computer systems for scholarly writing
From: Sandy Mamrak
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 1988 18:57
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 1988 18:57
22 lines
1547 bytes
1547 bytes
Craig Joseph and I have co-authored a technical report entitled Computerized Systems to Support Scholarly Writing: A Survey and Assessment. It is available free-of-charge by sending your post office address to me through email. ABSTRACT Existing computer systems to support scholarly writing are inadequate to meet the needs of authors. This paper presents a new model of scholarly writing, merging elements from several models of a scholar as a composing author. The new model identifies the activities that encompass the authoring task, arranged into three stages. The middle stage, composition, is bracketed by stages that support activities peripheral to the primary writing endeavor of forming a coherent sequence out of a set of ideas, notes, figures, and so on. The functionality of a computer system suitable to support this model of scholarly writing is described. An assessment of the capability of current technology to provide this functionality reveals that much research must be done before the necessary functionality can be supported by computers. A survey of six existing computerized writing systems is included: Concordia, Framework II, Fullwrite, Notecards, The Publisher and WE.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<28092@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!daemonShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!daemon From: mamrak@bucatina.cis.ohio-state.edu (Sandy Mamrak) Newsgroups: comp.text Subject: computer systems for scholarly writing Message-ID: <28092@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu> Date: 21 Nov 88 18:57:31 GMT Sender: daemon@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu Lines: 22