Article View: comp.text
Article #5662Re: Elan DWB II or Adobe Transcript for Sun?
From: Ken Greer
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 1989 18:36
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 1989 18:36
30 lines
1405 bytes
1405 bytes
From article <11759@grebyn.COM>, by karl@grebyn.COM (Karl Nyberg): > I tend to favor the Elan package (complete DWB, ditroff and previewer), > except I don't know anyone who is currently using it. The Elan folks tried > to make a big deal out of how much better ditroff was than otroff, but > seriously, how often has the regular troff crashed on you?? Otroff rarely core dumps, but it is super buggy. But that's not the biggest issue. The biggest deal is that otroff has the C/A/T conception of fonts: 1. You can have 4 fonts at a time with otroff You can have 50 fonts at a time with Eroff 2. Font spacing is awful (yuk, pooh!) with otroff. Font spacing is beautiful (aka professional) with Eroff 3. Eroff's troff has kerning. Otroff doesn't. 4. Eroff has a number of commands that make life simpler than otroff's. For example, I/O redirection: .tm something > file .tm something >> file A nice enhancement Elan has added. Better than the old way of redirecting stderr. Ken Greer elan!kg
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<408@elan.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!ames!elan!kgReferences:
<11759@grebyn.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!ames!elan!kg From: kg@elan.UUCP (Ken Greer) Newsgroups: comp.text Subject: Re: Elan DWB II or Adobe Transcript for Sun? Message-ID: <408@elan.UUCP> Date: 12 Jan 89 18:36:14 GMT References: <11759@grebyn.COM> Distribution: na Organization: Elan Computer Group, Inc., Palo Alto, CA Lines: 30