Article View: comp.text
Article #625WordPerfect vs. Ventura
From: Bob Armao
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 1989 19:23
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 1989 19:23
24 lines
1615 bytes
1615 bytes
I'm interested in first-hand reports of your experience using WordPerfect 5.0 to produce LONG documents (i.e., technical manuals exceeding 400+ pages in length). In particular, how well does 5.0 WP handle tables of contents, indexes, pagination, etc. in documents of this length? And how fast? Our experience with WP 4.2 under UNIX has been less than ideal. These shortcomings (such as the inability to produce a complete index from a concordance file) may or may not occur in WP 5.0. Since we aren't confident in the functionality and speed of WordPerfect5.0, we are considering using Ventura for managing long documents. I'd be interested hearing comparable experiences from Ventura users too, and especially from someone who has used both of these products to produce long manuals. I'm cross-posting this in comp.text since I'm getting virtually no traffic through comp.text.desktop. Thanks for your opinions and suggestions. -- Bob Armao (bob@brspyr1.BRS.Com) | If u cn rd ths sgntr, UUCP: uunet!crdgw1!brspyr1!bob | u cn mk Bg $$ induh xitng BRS Information Technologies | wrld ov dkumntshun. Phone: (518) 783-1161 |--------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<6288@brspyr1.BRS.Com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.csd.uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!crdgw1!brspyr1!bobShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.csd.uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!crdgw1!brspyr1!bob From: bob@brspyr1.BRS.Com (Bob Armao) Newsgroups: comp.text,comp.text.desktop Subject: WordPerfect vs. Ventura Keywords: long documents, indexes Message-ID: <6288@brspyr1.BRS.Com> Date: 21 Aug 89 19:23:35 GMT Organization: BRS Info Technologies, Latham NY Lines: 24