Article View: comp.text
Article #6603Re: Can the Pacific Page HPLJII PS cartridge print TeX dvi2ps?
From: Ron Guilmette
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1989 21:11
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1989 21:11
46 lines
2951 bytes
2951 bytes
In article <15071@eerie.acsu.Buffalo.EDU> regan@cs.Buffalo.EDU (Kenneth Regan) writes: >The "Pacific Page" is a fairly new ROM cartridge for the HP LJII which >interprets PostScript files at about the speed of the Apple LaserWriter Plus >(slower than the NT or NTX). It lists for $695 ($200 off is typical), >comes with the standard 35 LW+ typefaces, and can accept up to 4 soft fonts >/in Bitstream's format/. Therein lies the possible rub(s): I was asking about the combination of TeX+dvi2ps+PacificPage+HP/LJ2p here awhile ago also. I was informed by several people that I *could* spend that extra $695, but that it is probably unnecessary. Rather, several people suggested that I should just get the dvi2lj that is available somewhere/somehow (probably via anonymous FTP from science.utah.edu). Since TeX comes with its own fonts, why buy more in a cartridge? I was also informed that the 1 or 2 megabyte memory upgrade that the Pacific Page flyer recommends is also (most probably) unnecessary. Some people told me that the standard 1/2 MB in the HP/LJ2p will generally be sufficient for most work where you only use a couple of fonts per page. Note however that while I have taken the advice of *not* buying the PacificPage or the extra memory, I also have yet to purchase the HP/LJ2p! I just haven't gotten 'round to it yet. Thus, I cannot say with complete certainty that TeX+dvi2lj+HP/LJ2p works. I have also not yet had the time to port TeX and dvi2lj to my current system (a recently introduced RISC workstation). I have taken note however of the fact that there have been occasional reports here of various glitches when using dvi2lj. I believe that some of these have been attributed to minor differences between the various models of the HP LaserJets. (Note: the IIp is the newest and most inexpensive one, and I don't believe that I've seen anybody say here whether or not they have gotten TeX+dvi2lj+HP/LJ2p working reliably.) Can anyone reading this posting comment on (a) the availability of (various versions of?) dvi2lj, and (b) the reliability of that particular driver and its current state (i.e. are there patches available that might be needed or useful), and (c) the operation (successful or otherwise) of the combination of TeX+dvi2lj+HP/LJ2p. I, for one, am particularly interested in the IIp specifically. // rfg
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<258FF596.1429@paris.ics.uci.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!jarthur!uci-ics!rfgReferences:
<15071@eerie.acsu.Buffalo.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!jarthur!uci-ics!rfg From: rfg@ics.uci.edu (Ron Guilmette) Newsgroups: comp.text Subject: Re: Can the Pacific Page HPLJII PS cartridge print TeX dvi2ps? Message-ID: <258FF596.1429@paris.ics.uci.edu> Date: 20 Dec 89 21:11:49 GMT References: <15071@eerie.acsu.Buffalo.EDU> Reply-To: Ron Guilmette <rfg@ics.uci.edu> Distribution: na Organization: University of California, Irvine - Dept of ICS Lines: 46