Re: SGML: a different kind of markup (Was: Why learn Tex?)

Article View: comp.text

Article #6926

#6926

From: Ken Yap
Date: Sun, 04 Mar 1990 04:58

11 lines
1211 bytes

|SGML is not a "markup language" in the same sense as troff and TeX
|are:  there is historical justification for the use of the term
|"markup" in SGML, but it *does* cause much confusion.

Coombs, in his CACM article on markup languages of about two years ago
calls these descriptive markup and procedural markup respectively.

I wish I had the reference online. I also wish there was a standard for
machine readable references and that journals would use this standard
so that we could run our light pens over the strips and thousands of
readers worldwide would not have to key these in manually.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1990Mar4.045813.14391@cs.rochester.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!rutgers!rochester!ken

References: <1990Mar3.224625.2621@sq.sq.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!rutgers!rochester!ken
From: ken@cs.rochester.edu (Ken Yap)
Newsgroups: comp.text,comp.text.tex
Subject: Re: SGML: a different kind of markup (Was: Why learn Tex?)
Keywords: SGML, markup languages, troff, TeX, GenCode, typesetting
Message-ID: <1990Mar4.045813.14391@cs.rochester.edu>
Date: 4 Mar 90 04:58:13 GMT
References: <1990Mar3.224625.2621@sq.sq.com>
Reply-To: ken@cs.rochester.edu
Distribution: comp
Organization: University of Rochester Computer Science Department
Lines: 11
Address: Rochester, NY 14627, (716) 275-1448

Reply to Parent Message