Article View: comp.text
Article #788Re: Which is better? Textprocessing langs or DeskTop publishing pgms?
From: ccmiguel
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 1989 08:36
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 1989 08:36
25 lines
1534 bytes
1534 bytes
In article <2650@trantor.harris-atd.com>, chuck@melmac.harris-atd.com (Chuck Musciano) writes: > I am an unabashed Frame fan, but InterLeaf is loaded with features. > Its interface leaves a lot to be desired, and it can be really expensive > for the full system. I would suggest that you get demo tapes from the > "big three" (Frame, InterLeaf, and Publisher) and give them a try. Each > has a certain niche, and you should try to find your niche before arbitrarily ^^^^^ > picking a tool. > I would be very interested if you could describe those "niches" in more detail. I like The Publisher but don't know how it measures up against Frame and Interleaf. Please? ---------------------------------------------------------- Miguel Peirano Prentice Computer Centre - University of Queensland ST LUCIA QLD 4067, AUSTRALIA - Phone +61 (07) 377-4169 - FAX +61 (07) 371-8380 ccmiguel@uqvax.decnet.uq.oz UUCP ...!seismo!munnari!uqvax.decnet.uq.oz!ccmiguel ----------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5258@uqvax.decnet.uq.oz>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!uhccux!munnari.oz.au!murtoa.cs.mu.oz.au!otc!metro!bunyip!uqvax!ccmiguelReferences:
<509@mjbtn.MFEE.TN.US> <2650@trantor.harris-atd.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!uhccux!munnari.oz.au!murtoa.cs.mu.oz.au!otc!metro!bunyip!uqvax!ccmiguel From: ccmiguel@uqvax.decnet.uq.oz Newsgroups: comp.text,comp.text.desktop Subject: Re: Which is better? Textprocessing langs or DeskTop publishing pgms? Message-ID: <5258@uqvax.decnet.uq.oz> Date: 11 Sep 89 08:36:35 GMT References: <509@mjbtn.MFEE.TN.US> <2650@trantor.harris-atd.com> Organization: University Of Queensland Lines: 25