Article View: comp.text
Article #867Re: spelling-checkers for TeX
From: John T Kohl
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 1989 16:33
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 1989 16:33
27 lines
1733 bytes
1733 bytes
In article <11875@polya.Stanford.EDU> rokicki@Neon.Stanford.EDU (Tomas G. Rokicki) writes:
Path: bloom-beacon!usc!apple!agate!shelby!polya!Neon.Stanford.EDU!rokicki
From: rokicki@Neon.Stanford.EDU (Tomas G. Rokicki)
Newsgroups: comp.text
Date: 21 Sep 89 02:28:53 GMT
Sender: USENET News System <news@Polya.Stanford.EDU>
Lines: 8
Most people `detex', then spell. Then they have two documents, one
with correct spellings, and one with the TeX commands. Neither is
really what they want.
Why not just use the '-t' option to ispell (if you use ispell)? Not
perfect, but pretty good:
The -t option selects TeX/LaTeX input mode. In this mode,
whenever a backslash ("\") is found, ispell will skip to the
next whitespace. Thus, for example, given
\chapter {This is a Ckapter} \cite{SCH86}
will find "Ckapter" but will not look for SCH. The -t
option does not recognize the TeX comment character "%".
--
John Kohl <jtkohl@ATHENA.MIT.EDU> or <jtkohl@Kolvir.Brookline.MA.US>
Digital Equipment Corporation/Project Athena
(The above opinions are MINE. Don't put my words in somebody else's mouth!)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<JTKOHL.89Sep21123302@quicksilver.MIT.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!watmath!att!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!bloom-beacon!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!jtkohlReferences:
<11875@polya.Stanford.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!watmath!att!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!bloom-beacon!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!jtkohl From: jtkohl@quicksilver.MIT.EDU (John T Kohl) Newsgroups: comp.text Subject: Re: spelling-checkers for TeX Message-ID: <JTKOHL.89Sep21123302@quicksilver.MIT.EDU> Date: 21 Sep 89 16:33:02 GMT References: <11875@polya.Stanford.EDU> Sender: daemon@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU Reply-To: jtkohl@ATHENA.MIT.EDU Organization: /mit/jtkohl/.organization Lines: 27 In-reply-to: rokicki@Neon.Stanford.EDU's message of 21 Sep 89 02:28:53 GMT