Article View: comp.text
Article #3856Re: "Berkeley version" of ditroff ?
From: Lee Moore
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 1987 20:30
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 1987 20:30
13 lines
1189 bytes
1189 bytes
> > At some time in the distant past I'd seen references to a "Berkeley version"
> > of ditroff. Is this real, or was this a bad pointer? If it is real,
> > what is this "Berkeley version" and how would I get it?
UC Berkeley (Computer Center) did hack on ti-troff to have longer names.
They did other things to but I can't recall exactly.
Lee
--
Lee Moore -- Xerox Webster Research Center, birthplace of the XGP
UUCP: {seismo, allegra, decvax, cmcl2, topaz}!rochester!rocksanne!lee
Arpa Internet: Moore.wbst@xerox.arpa
DDN: +1 (716) 422-2496
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<326@rocksanne.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!husc6!rutgers!princeton!rocksvax!rocksanne!leeReferences:
<1490@rosevax.Rosemount.COM> <360e65f8.1054@apollo.uucp>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!husc6!rutgers!princeton!rocksvax!rocksanne!lee From: lee@rocksanne.UUCP (Lee Moore) Newsgroups: comp.text Subject: Re: "Berkeley version" of ditroff ? Message-ID: <326@rocksanne.UUCP> Date: Wed, 15-Jul-87 16:30:00 EDT Article-I.D.: rocksann.326 Posted: Wed Jul 15 16:30:00 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 18-Jul-87 00:41:32 EDT References: <1490@rosevax.Rosemount.COM> <360e65f8.1054@apollo.uucp> Distribution: na Organization: Xerox: Webster Research Center, Rochester, NY Lines: 13 Summary: berkeley version really is different