Article View: comp.theory
Article #1747damsel in distress over comp. theory
From: Nina Joshi
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 01:06
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 01:06
24 lines
1642 bytes
1642 bytes
I studied software and hardware standards and practices in a unit and have come to the conclusion that most are too idealistic. The assumption prevalent in most computing theory is that it is possible to maintain an engineering standard....it isn't unless enforced....a car can be built in a large production plant in one way, leaving less room to mess up the production stage...however, software can be designed and constructed in umpteen number of ways and unless a guideline is adhered to, the end product may be an inefficient piece of junk... I am not revering standards in all situations, but they would help maintain consistency in software production and use...I am currently undertaking a consultancy project with a large firm. The chaos is apparent, and to recommend standards for use of the software seems to be too optimistic. The particular section I am dealing with needs to be recommended practical, realistic standards, applicable in a workshop... Any ideas?? -- *********************************** * Nina Joshi * * at Brunel University * * doing Applied Computer Systems * * * * But I don't know why!! *
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<BzL4E7.3Bv@brunel.ac.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!paladin.american.edu!news.univie.ac.at!hp4at!mcsun!uknet!brunel!cs89nnjShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!paladin.american.edu!news.univie.ac.at!hp4at!mcsun!uknet!brunel!cs89nnj From: cs89nnj@brunel.ac.uk (Nina Joshi) Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: damsel in distress over comp. theory Message-ID: <BzL4E7.3Bv@brunel.ac.uk> Date: 21 Dec 92 01:06:06 GMT Organization: Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK Lines: 24 X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8]