Re: Modulus (Re: hashing function for strings)

Article View: comp.theory

Article #2098

#2098

From: Robert Firth
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1990 17:46

8 lines
850 bytes

In article <8574@shlump.nac.dec.com> postpischil@alien.enet.dec.com (Always mount a scratch monkey.) writes:

>The difference between the two divisions is that one preserves reflectional
>symmetry and one preserves translational symmetry.  Can you make an argument
>that one symmetry is more aesthetic than another?

I agree completely.  That's why, in my opinion, you can't call one
semantics 'right' and the other 'wrong'.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <6202@bd.sei.cmu.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!pt.cs.cmu.edu!sei!firth

References: <8574@shlump.nac.dec.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!pt.cs.cmu.edu!sei!firth
From: firth@sei.cmu.edu (Robert Firth)
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Modulus (Re: hashing function for strings)
Message-ID: <6202@bd.sei.cmu.edu>
Date: 22 Feb 90 17:46:06 GMT
References: <8574@shlump.nac.dec.com>
Reply-To: firth@sei.cmu.edu (Robert Firth)
Organization: Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh, PA
Lines: 8

Reply to Parent Message