Article View: comp.unix.admin
Article #4437Re: Sysadmins overtime eligible?
From: Jimi Thompson
Date: Tue, 08 May 2001 04:09
Date: Tue, 08 May 2001 04:09
32 lines
2757 bytes
2757 bytes
T Bob, the mostly all knowing (tm) <bob@noses.org> wrote in message news:Pine.LNX.4.30.0105061558340.13121-100000@hermes.noses.org... > I'm employed in the state of California as a UNIX administrator. I am > salaried, at a rate that, divied by 52 and again by 40, is significantly > less than $41/hour. My job description includes "analyze user > requirements, proceedures, and probles to automate processing or to > improve existing systems," [sec. 3(1)(A)], "plan, design, and build medium > and large-scale UNIX systems to support developers and provide computing > services required by end users," [sec. 3(1)(B)], etc. > > However, subdivision (b) (exceptions to the overtime elibigility) > specifies: "The employee is engaged in the operation of computers or in > the manufacture, repair, or maintenance of computer hardware and > related equipment." > > Ungh. I wish I was a lawyer. The link to the full text of the bill: > http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/99-00/bill/sen/sb_0051-0100/sb_88_bill_20000919_c haptered.html > > I can provide my full job description if anyone wants to see it. > > Just wondering, because the recent downturn has left my roommate > unemployed, and us locked into a lease that we can't afford to break, and > a few extra bucks where I can find them will help immeasurably. :/ > > Thanks in advance, > Bob The normal sysadmin job description would apply to the "maintence" portion of section b. >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9d7r9f$1v6q$1@newssvr05-en0.news.prodigy.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!207.115.63.138!newscon04.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prodigy.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<Pine.LNX.4.30.0105061558340.13121-100000@hermes.noses.org>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1038e3,2f6b773838495583 X-Google-Attributes: gid1038e3,public X-Google-Thread: 1020c6,2f6b773838495583 X-Google-Attributes: gid1020c6,public X-Google-Thread: 114a52,2f6b773838495583 X-Google-Attributes: gid114a52,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-05-07 21:14:11 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!207.115.63.138!newscon04.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prodigy.com!not-for-mail From: "Jimi Thompson" <JIMIT@prodigy.net> Newsgroups: comp.unix.admin,misc.legal,law.school.legal-prof Subject: Re: Sysadmins overtime eligible? Date: Mon, 7 May 2001 23:09:18 -0500 Organization: Prodigy http://www.prodigy.com Lines: 34 Message-ID: <9d7r9f$1v6q$1@newssvr05-en0.news.prodigy.com> References: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0105061558340.13121-100000@hermes.noses.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp-208-188-26-129.dialup.rcsntx.swbell.net X-Trace: newssvr05-en0.news.prodigy.com 989294704 6433617 208.188.26.129 (8 May 2001 04:05:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@prodigy.net NNTP-Posting-Date: 8 May 2001 04:05:04 GMT X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200