Article View: comp.unix.admin
Article #4440Secure backups with tar
From: nwaltham
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 00:00
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 00:00
18 lines
1754 bytes
1754 bytes
Hello All, I have a Redhat Linux 5.2 server with the kernel upgraded to 2.1.10. I have taken various physical security measures like making lilo boot straight in without waiting for a prompt, passwording the bios setup and disabling the floppy in the BIOS. It strikes me that the weakest point, from a physical point of view is the tape backup. The tapes are made using tar, so could be read easily on other machines. I would like to continue using tar, but what could I use as a filter (some kind of compressable encryption with password) which would offer some kind of protection? I don't think we are under any real threat, I just want to do things using 'good practices' just in case I am asked!!!! Thanks in advance, Nick Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<7kqlqd$67d$1@nnrp1.deja.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 111240,4fe1f5fa424afc02 X-Google-Attributes: gid111240,public X-Google-Thread: 1020c6,4fe1f5fa424afc02 X-Google-Attributes: gid1020c6,public X-Google-Thread: f9074,4fe1f5fa424afc02 X-Google-Attributes: gidf9074,public X-Google-Thread: 1103af,4fe1f5fa424afc02 X-Google-Attributes: gid1103af,public From: nwaltham@my-deja.com Subject: Secure backups with tar Date: 1999/06/23 Message-ID: <7kqlqd$67d$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Deja-AN: 492909874 X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 proxy.colombianet.net:8000 (Squid/1.1.22), 1.0 x37.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client unknown, 63.65.214.3 Organization: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't. X-Article-Creation-Date: Wed Jun 23 13:01:07 1999 GMT Newsgroups: comp.unix.admin,linux.admin,linux.redhat.misc,comp.os.linux.misc X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; Windows 98; TUCOWS; DigExt)