Article View: comp.unix.internals
Article #2576Re: Regular pipe vs. Named Pipe
From: Peter da Silva
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 1991 00:46
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 1991 00:46
17 lines
1377 bytes
1377 bytes
In article <1991Jun21.142246.25245@utstat.uucp> tg@utstat.uucp (Tom Glinos) writes: > The glory of message queues is that they can be amazingly fast. Ah, an implementation detail. > When I looked into this several years ago I found that systems > that when a system supports both message queues and named pipes > the message queues are orders of magnitudes faster than named pipes. Yes, but that's to be expected. It's the same high priests of evil that did the implementations of both. If they had implemented message queues as special files like named pipes (easy enough to do) they'd be just as fast and we wouldn't have to sacrifice the purity of our bodily fluids to get our work done. -- Peter da Silva; Ferranti International Controls Corporation; +1 713 274 5180; Sugar Land, TX 77487-5012; `-_-' "Have you hugged your wolf, today?"
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<H.5CZ.2@xds13.ferranti.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!uupsi!ficc!peterReferences:
<19382@rpp386.cactus.org> <3048.Jun1423.16.2891@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> <0M1C6FF@xds13.ferranti.com> <1991Jun21.142246.25245@utstat.uucp>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.unix.internals Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!uupsi!ficc!peter From: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) Subject: Re: Regular pipe vs. Named Pipe Message-ID: <H.5CZ.2@xds13.ferranti.com> Reply-To: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) Organization: Xenix Support, FICC References: <19382@rpp386.cactus.org> <3048.Jun1423.16.2891@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> <0M1C6FF@xds13.ferranti.com> <1991Jun21.142246.25245@utstat.uucp> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 91 00:46:00 GMT