Re: pause(3) vs. sigpause(2)

Article View: comp.unix.programmer

Article #1148

Back to comp.unix.programmer Previous Next

#1148

From: Chris Torek
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 1990 07:47

8 lines
876 bytes

In article <27338@mimsy.umd.edu> I wrote:
>pause() is effectively equivalent to sigpause(sigblock((sigmask_t)0)).

Oops, that should be `sigset_t', not `sigmask_t'.  (Of course, many systems
have neither, which is why I suggested 0L or plain 0 as well.)
-- 
In-Real-Life: Chris Torek, Univ of MD Comp Sci Dept (+1 301 405 2750)
Domain:	chris@cs.umd.edu	Path:	uunet!mimsy!chris

Technical Details

Message-ID: <27343@mimsy.umd.edu>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!att!linac!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!udel!haven!mimsy!chris

References: <43321@eerie.acsu.Buffalo.EDU> <717@inews.intel.com> <27338@mimsy.umd.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!att!linac!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!udel!haven!mimsy!chris
From: chris@mimsy.umd.edu (Chris Torek)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.programmer
Subject: Re: pause(3) vs. sigpause(2)
Message-ID: <27343@mimsy.umd.edu>
Date: 1 Nov 90 07:47:19 GMT
References: <43321@eerie.acsu.Buffalo.EDU> <717@inews.intel.com> <27338@mimsy.umd.edu>
Organization: U of Maryland, Dept. of Computer Science, Coll. Pk., MD 20742
Lines: 8

Reply to Parent Message