🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.unix.programmer
Article #1151

Re: Sized_io vs Auth

#1151
From: Don Libes
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 1990 19:35
19 lines
1290 bytes
In article <1990Nov1.142910.6594@ecn.purdue.edu> longshot@ei.ecn.purdue.edu (Richard C Long) writes:
>
>	I've gotten a hold of both sized_io and auth.  I've been working with
>  sized_io for a bit, and generally like the size of it...  nice and small.
>  However, I have some questions about it:
>      (1) I have accounts on machines that do not have the 68010 libs,
>	  are there any substitutes?

You can delete all references to 68010.  That was just a hack to
produce code acceptable to both 68010 and 68020 at the same time.

If you are producing separate libraries, sized_io is portable to any
(reasonable) architecture as it does the necessary byte-swapping itself.

>      (2) Is there a handy way to get a list of all clients, so as to make
>	  a broadcast message?

You may not have realized it, but the 2nd argument you pass to
select_server_stream is exactly a list of all clients.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <7721@muffin.cme.nist.gov>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!cme!libes
References: <1990Nov1.142910.6594@ecn.purdue.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!cme!libes
From: libes@cme.nist.gov (Don Libes)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.programmer
Subject: Re: Sized_io vs Auth
Message-ID: <7721@muffin.cme.nist.gov>
Date: 1 Nov 90 19:35:18 GMT
References: <1990Nov1.142910.6594@ecn.purdue.edu>
Organization: National Institute of Standards and Technology
Lines: 19