Re: How to guarantee the death of a child process

Article View: comp.unix.programmer

Article #1236

Back to comp.unix.programmer Previous Next

#1236

From: Dave Smythe
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 1990 08:11

7 lines
706 bytes

Regarding killing the other siblings, could you not simply send SIGTERM, or
somesuch to the process group?  That would get them all...

D
-- 
Dave Smythe
netcom!dsmythe@apple.com   N6XLP  (also dsmythe@portia.stanford.edu)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <16933@netcom.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!netcom!dsmythe

References: <1990Nov14.180538.9896@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov> <12481@medusa.cs.purdue.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!netcom!dsmythe
From: dsmythe@netcom.UUCP (Dave Smythe)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.programmer
Subject: Re: How to guarantee the death of a child process
Message-ID: <16933@netcom.UUCP>
Date: 16 Nov 90 08:11:14 GMT
References: <1990Nov14.180538.9896@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov> <12481@medusa.cs.purdue.edu>
Distribution: usa
Organization: Netcom- The Bay Area's Public Access Unix System {408 241-9760 guest}
Lines: 7

Reply to Parent Message