Re: Variable length arg lists in C (gcc): stdarg vs. varargs

Article View: comp.unix.programmer

Article #3515

Back to comp.unix.programmer Previous Next

#3515

From: Kaz Kylheku
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 00:00

10 lines
1270 bytes

On 11 Oct 2000 12:00:19 -0500, Kenny McCormack <gazelle@yin.interaccess.com>
wrote:
>Notes, presented in no particular order:
>	1) I don't know if this is a GCC under Unix specific question (which
>	   is my primary/only focus) or if it relates to all C compilers
>	   and/or all platforms.
>	2) From what I can tell, there is a thing called varargs that is:
>		a) More powerful than stdarg

There is a language called assembly that is more powerful than C. ;)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <slrn8u9e3k.1r2.kaz@ashi.FootPrints.net>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <8s26b3$9vl$1@yin.interaccess.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fc89c,22450a31b48667a4
X-Google-Attributes: gidfc89c,public
X-Google-Thread: f65d0,22450a31b48667a4
X-Google-Attributes: gidf65d0,public
From: kaz@ashi.footprints.net (Kaz Kylheku)
Subject: Re: Variable length arg lists in C (gcc): stdarg vs. varargs
Date: 2000/10/11
Message-ID: <slrn8u9e3k.1r2.kaz@ashi.FootPrints.net>
X-Deja-AN: 680261207
References: <8s26b3$9vl$1@yin.interaccess.com>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@look.ca
X-Trace: brie.direct.ca 971290443 204.239.179.1 (Wed, 11 Oct 2000 11:54:03 PDT)
Organization: Psycho-Neurotic Institute for the Very, Very Nervous
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.5.7 (UNIX)
Reply-To: kaz@ashi.footprints.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 11:54:03 PDT
Newsgroups: comp.unix.programmer,gnu.gcc

Reply to Parent Message