Re: gcc -O2 bug

Article View: comp.unix.programmer

Article #3658

Back to comp.unix.programmer Previous Next

#3658

From: Danette & Murray Root
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 1996 00:00

8 lines
973 bytes

On 7 Aug 1996 22:35:57 -0500, mrbig@freeside.fc.net (Mike Big) wrote
in comp.lang.c:

=>/* 
=>I'v found what I think might be a bug in gcc's optimization.  The

That's not a bug, that's the reason for the 'volatile' keyword.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <4ubogp$e8a@mule1.mindspring.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <4ubnat$75u@freeside.fc.net>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 11318c,7d30cae02ba9b089
X-Google-Attributes: gid11318c,public
X-Google-Thread: 10c696,7d30cae02ba9b089
X-Google-Attributes: gid10c696,public
X-Google-Thread: fc89c,7d30cae02ba9b089
X-Google-Attributes: gidfc89c,public
X-Google-Thread: 1014db,7d30cae02ba9b089
X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public
From: mroot@atl.mindspring.com (Danette & Murray Root)
Subject: Re: gcc -O2 bug
Date: 1996/08/08
Message-ID: <4ubogp$e8a@mule1.mindspring.com>
X-Deja-AN: 172825917
references: <4ubnat$75u@freeside.fc.net>
organization: MindSpring Enterprises
reply-to: mroot@atl.mindspring.com
newsgroups: comp.unix.programmer,gnu.gcc.help,comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.lang.c

Reply to Parent Message