🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <10511@panix.UUCP> jsb@panix.UUCP (J. S. B'ach) writes:
>In article <2782@idunno.Princeton.EDU> subbarao@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Kartik Subbarao) writes:
>)Then you simply write a C program that checks the status of the file,
>)to see whether someone (the fingerer) has opened it. Then simply
>)write your message to the named pipe. You can do many fancy things with this.
>
>And does this C program run all the time checking?  Or does it sleep
>until fingered?  Even in the latter case some system resources are 
>permanently tied up.  Now (as Emanuel Kant might say) if everyone were
>to do this, the entire process table would fill up!

No. If you write on a pipe with noone at the other end, then the process
blocks (doesn't do anything), until someone starts reading from the pipe.
I had a similar version to r$'s running on this machine for about 8 hours
and it consumed 0.00 cpu seconds (according to ps). The process only takes
up cpu if someone fingers you.

Dylan.
-- 
Matthew J Farwell                 | Email: dylan@ibmpcug.co.uk
The IBM PC User Group, PO Box 360,|        ...!uunet!ukc!ibmpcug!dylan
Harrow HA1 4LQ England            | CONNECT - Usenet Access in the UK!!
Phone: +44 81-863-1191            | Sun? Don't they make coffee machines?