🚀 go-pugleaf

On 16 Jul 1997 14:26:58 GMT, "Kim B�ndergaard Poulsen" <kbp@cci.dk>
wrote:

>My question is: Do you know of any official and supported product just as
>good as samba.
Why an alternative? Samba _is_ commercially supported, not
by a single company but by Samba-consultants. Have a look
at the Samba-homepage, there is a link to the list.

BTW: I think this type of support might be even BETTER
than from one single company.

Bye,

Raphael Leiteritz

rleiter@indisoft.com

Kim B�ndergaard Poulsen <kbp@cci.dk> skrev i artiklen
<01bc91f4$443038f0$93100101@kbp>...
> Hi netters
> 
> My question is: Do you know of any official and supported product just as
> good as samba.
> 
Du kan evt. kigge p� www.netmanage.com, de har lavet er NFS som skulle
k�re mange gange hurtigere end det nuv�rende, det k�rer ogs� p� kryds
af forskellige platforme.

Give Syntax a call.  Their product is called Totalnet Advanced Server. =

Give them a call at (206)838-2626.  I am using their product at US DoJ
and am very happy with the support I have got so far.
	Arun
Kim B=F8ndergaard Poulsen wrote:
> =

> Hi netters
> =

> My company sells computer systems consisting of an unix server (AIX or
> Solaris) and a number of NT clients. This clients gets access to the
> servers by SMB.
> =

> At the moment I'm using AIX Connections on AIX servers and Solstice
> LMServer on Solaris Servers but these seems not be as good as e.g. samb=
a
> (seen from a functionality point of view) but they sure has the advanta=
ge
> of being official supported by big companies.
> =

> My question is: Do you know of any official and supported product just =
as
> good as samba.
> =

> I can tell you that one of my problems with the two official ones are l=
ack
> of the RDONLY possibility for a complete volume despite what file
> permissions says.
> =

> Thanks in advance
> Kim B=F8ndergaard
> CCI Europe
> kbp@cci.dk

-- =

Arun Gurjale
Director, Telecommunications
INDUS Corporation
1953 Gallows Road, Suite 300
Vienna, VA 22182

E-Mail
Home:  gurjale.arun@worldnet.att.net
Work:  agurjale@induscorp.com

"Kim Bondergaard Poulsen" <kbp@cci.dk> writes:

>At the moment I'm using AIX Connections on AIX servers and Solstice
>LMServer on Solaris Servers but these seems not be as good as e.g. samba
>(seen from a functionality point of view) but they sure has the advantage
>of being official supported by big companies.
>
>My question is: Do you know of any official and supported product just as
>good as samba.

Err, at the risk of sounding funny, why not just buy commercial
support for Samba ?

Check out :

http://lake.canberra.edu.au/pub/samba/

and click on the rotating "Samba Commercial Support" button.

After all, why do you want something 'as good as the real thing'
when you can have 'the real thing' :-).

Regards,

	Jeremy Allison.
	Samba Team.

Have you had a look at SCO VisionFS? A 30 evaluation is available from
http://www.vision.sco.com/products. It's supported on AIX 3.2.5+ and
Solaris 2.3+ (as well as many others). I'm not sure what the RDONLY
problem is (not familiar with the other products), but VisionFS allows
complete shares to be offered read-only, although it wil not exceed the
existing UNIX permissions.

Cheers
Toby

> My question is: Do you know of any official and supported product just as
> good as samba.
> 
> I can tell you that one of my problems with the two official ones are lack
> of the RDONLY possibility for a complete volume despite what file
> permissions says.

Raphael Leiteritz wrote in article <33cf0ec7.2410296@news.unlisys.net>...

>On 16 Jul 1997 14:26:58 GMT, "Kim B�ndergaard Poulsen" <kbp@cci.dk>
>wrote:
>
>>My question is: Do you know of any official and supported product just as
>>good as samba.
>Why an alternative? Samba _is_ commercially supported, not
>by a single company but by Samba-consultants. Have a look
>at the Samba-homepage, there is a link to the list.
>
>BTW: I think this type of support might be even BETTER
>than from one single company.

Heck, this is what you get when you buy Windows NT. You buy NT, get awful,
limited support from Microsoft, and then hire a consoltant to do the real
support.

I like the idea of SAMBA, where you just pay for the support :)

Thornton

Jeremy Allison wrote:
> 
> "Kim Bondergaard Poulsen" <kbp@cci.dk> writes:
> 
> >At the moment I'm using AIX Connections on AIX servers and Solstice
> >LMServer on Solaris Servers but these seems not be as good as e.g. samba
> >(seen from a functionality point of view) but they sure has the advantage
> >of being official supported by big companies.
> >
> >My question is: Do you know of any official and supported product just as
> >good as samba.
> 
> Err, at the risk of sounding funny, why not just buy commercial
> support for Samba ?
> 
> Check out :
> 
> http://lake.canberra.edu.au/pub/samba/
> 
> and click on the rotating "Samba Commercial Support" button.
> 
> After all, why do you want something 'as good as the real thing'
> when you can have 'the real thing' :-).
> 
> Regards,
> 
>         Jeremy Allison.
>         Samba Team.

Check out http://www.syntax.com

They have a products called Total Advanced Server - pretty need.

Kim Bj�rn Nielsen - LEGO

Kim B�ndergaard Poulsen <kbp@cci.dk> skrev i artiklen
<01bc91f4$443038f0$93100101@kbp>...
> Hi netters
> 
> My company sells computer systems consisting of an unix server (AIX or
> Solaris) and a number of NT clients. This clients gets access to the
> servers by SMB.
> 
> At the moment I'm using AIX Connections on AIX servers and Solstice
> LMServer on Solaris Servers but these seems not be as good as e.g. samba
> (seen from a functionality point of view) but they sure has the advantage
> of being official supported by big companies.
> 
> My question is: Do you know of any official and supported product just as
> good as samba.
> 
> I can tell you that one of my problems with the two official ones are
lack
> of the RDONLY possibility for a complete volume despite what file
> permissions says.
> 
> Thanks in advance
> Kim B�ndergaard
> CCI Europe
> kbp@cci.dk
>