Article View: comp.unix.shell
Article #108Re: file name completion for ksh?
From: Boyd Roberts
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1992 22:34
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1992 22:34
11 lines
889 bytes
889 bytes
In article <m5fmwq.sjs@netcom.com>, sjs@netcom.com (Stephen Schow) writes: > The ksh is hands down the best. As the last response showed, there is usually > a way to do it in the ksh. The Turing Machine is hands down the best. There is usually a way to do it in the Turing Machine... Boyd Roberts boyd@prl.dec.com ``When the going gets wierd, the weird turn pro...''
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Jul22.223459.19896@prl.dec.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!decwrl!pa.dec.com!decprl!decprl!boydReferences:
<1992Jul20.143443.16536@rtsg.mot.com> <m5fmwq.sjs@netcom.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!decwrl!pa.dec.com!decprl!decprl!boyd From: boyd@prl.dec.com (Boyd Roberts) Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell Subject: Re: file name completion for ksh? Message-ID: <1992Jul22.223459.19896@prl.dec.com> Date: 22 Jul 92 22:34:59 GMT References: <1992Jul20.143443.16536@rtsg.mot.com> <m5fmwq.sjs@netcom.com> Sender: news@prl.dec.com (USENET News System) Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation - Paris Research Laboratory Lines: 11 Nntp-Posting-Host: prl313.prl.dec.com