Re: file name completion for ksh?

Article View: comp.unix.shell

Article #112

#112

From: Tom Christiansen
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1992 03:36

13 lines
1299 bytes

From the keyboard of sjs@netcom.com (Stephen Schow):
:The ksh is hands down the best.  As the last response showed, there is usually
:a way to do it in the ksh.  In addition, the ksh has tons of over features
:that none of the other shells can even touch.  

Down boy.  That's overkill.  Read the tcsh man page some day.

--tom
-- 
    Tom Christiansen      tchrist@convex.com      convex!tchrist


Any opinions expressed are my own, and generally unpopular with others.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Jul23.033602.19925@news.eng.convex.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!sun-barr!apple!news.oc.com!convex!tchrist

References: <1992Jul20.143443.16536@rtsg.mot.com> <m5fmwq.sjs@netcom.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!sun-barr!apple!news.oc.com!convex!tchrist
From: Tom Christiansen <tchrist@convex.COM>
Subject: Re: file name completion for ksh?
Message-ID: <1992Jul23.033602.19925@news.eng.convex.com>
Originator: tchrist@pixel.convex.com
Sender: usenet@news.eng.convex.com (news access account)
Nntp-Posting-Host: pixel.convex.com
Reply-To: tchrist@convex.COM (Tom Christiansen)
Organization: CONVEX Realtime Development, Colorado Springs, CO
References: <1992Jul20.143443.16536@rtsg.mot.com> <m5fmwq.sjs@netcom.com>
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1992 03:36:02 GMT
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.
Lines: 13

Reply to Parent Message