Article View: comp.unix.shell
Article #1230Re: sh vs. sh5 in ultrix
From: Douglas F. DeJulio
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 1990 17:38
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 1990 17:38
16 lines
1116 bytes
1116 bytes
wnp@iiasa.AT (wolf paul) writes: > In article <3865@umbc3.UMBC.EDU> rouben@math13.math.umbc.edu writes: > >-rwxr-xr-x 1 root system 45056 Apr 1 12:27 /bin/sh > >-rwxr-xr-x 2 root system 163840 Apr 1 09:56 /usr/bin/sh5 > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root 23552 Jan 11 1989 /bin/sh > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root 44032 Jan 11 1989 /bin/sh5 > That's not even twice the size! > > I suspect that on your machine, sh is stripped, and sh5 is not. I suspect that the first figures are for a DECstation and the last are for a VAXstation. Remember, RISCish binaries will almost always be much bigger than CISCish binaries. -- DdJ
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<kasyOjW00VI8I0gZoU@andrew.cmu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!snorkelwacker!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!pt.cs.cmu.edu!o.gp.cs.cmu.edu!andrew.cmu.edu!dd26+References:
<3865@umbc3.UMBC.EDU>, <879@iiasa.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!snorkelwacker!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!pt.cs.cmu.edu!o.gp.cs.cmu.edu!andrew.cmu.edu!dd26+ From: dd26+@andrew.cmu.edu (Douglas F. DeJulio) Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell Subject: Re: sh vs. sh5 in ultrix Message-ID: <kasyOjW00VI8I0gZoU@andrew.cmu.edu> Date: 4 Sep 90 17:38:55 GMT References: <3865@umbc3.UMBC.EDU>, <879@iiasa.UUCP> Organization: Chemistry, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA Lines: 16 In-Reply-To: <879@iiasa.UUCP>