🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <4140@lib.tmc.edu>, jmaynard@thesis1.hsch.utexas.edu (Jay Maynard) writes:
>
>OK...so it's not OK to blatantly advertise commercial products, but it's OK to
>blatantly advertise the soi-disant Free Software Foundation's products. I get
>it now.

That's right.  In the former case, a comercial entity gains advantage
at the expense of the USENET community.  In the latter, everyone
benefits and no profits are made at the expense of others.

>GNU stuff is *not* free. It costs something other than money, though: it costs
>your freedom to do as you like with your code if you include even a line of
>their code. $150 sure sounds cheap by comparison.

Yes, their are restrictions on what you can do with *their*
code--you're free to do whatever you want with your own code--but
isn't that only fair?  And there is absolutely no reason why one would
need to include a modified bash in their product, so the fear of it
causing you to give your precious code away is baseless.

-- 
Dave Sill (de5@ornl.gov)
Martin Marietta Energy Systems
Workstation Support