🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Jul23.082108.29589@news.acns.nwu.edu> navarra@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (John Navarra) writes:
>In article <1992Jul23.033602.19925@news.eng.convex.com> tchrist@convex.COM (Tom Christiansen) writes:
>>From the keyboard of sjs@netcom.com (Stephen Schow):
>>:The ksh is hands down the best.  As the last response showed, there is usually
>>:a way to do it in the ksh.  In addition, the ksh has tons of over features
>>:that none of the other shells can even touch.  
>>
>>Down boy.  That's overkill.  Read the tcsh man page some day.
>>
>        And zsh has even more features! Ruf! Ruf!

   Ah yes, features.  What would we do without them?  Probably get more
work done, instead of endlessly tweaking our environments to no useful end.

   I probably have the most complicated initialization scripts that anyone
has ever devised (if you don't believe me, email me and we can arrange to
compare).  One of these days, when I come to my senses, I'll switch to rc
and use it vanilla.

   Features?  You need features like you need poison ivy.