Re: Gawk v24.7: Why Bother???

Article View: comp.unix.shell

Article #4599

#4599

From: the MOST SIGNIFICANT bit
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 1995 00:00

12 lines
908 bytes

urlichs@smurf.noris.de (Matthias Urlichs) writes:


>NB: (THis is a semi-serious question) Is there anything at all which gawk
>    can do better than Perl5?


    (presumably) interpret awk code.

--xmsb
xmsb@borland.com
xmsb@slaughter.com

Technical Details

Message-ID: <xmsb.798614162@shadow>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <3mpj9f$d1h@csnews.cs.colorado.edu> <jerry.798231458@tivoli.com> <3n8qt8$shf@smurf.noris.de>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,4df32fd703a6b724
X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public
X-Google-Thread: 10259a,c6417ab4174dabc8
X-Google-Attributes: gid10259a,public
X-Google-Thread: 1012a6,4df32fd703a6b724
X-Google-Attributes: gid1012a6,public
From: xmsb@shadow.borland.com (the MOST SIGNIFICANT bit)
Subject: Re: Gawk v24.7: Why Bother???
Date: 1995/04/23
Message-ID: <xmsb.798614162@shadow>
X-Deja-AN: 101361852
references: <3mpj9f$d1h@csnews.cs.colorado.edu> <jerry.798231458@tivoli.com> <3n8qt8$shf@smurf.noris.de>
organization: Borland Intl
newsgroups: comp.unix.shell,gnu.misc.discuss,comp.lang.perl

Reply to Parent Message