Re: Bourne Shell Programming Considered Harmful

Article View: comp.unix.shell

Article #55

#55

From: Boyd Roberts
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 1992 12:56

10 lines
888 bytes

In article <Bx4Myp.Czr@unix.amherst.edu>, twpierce@unix.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce) writes:
> The command syntax really sucks, man.
> 

But it does _work_, in direct contrast to [t]csh.


Boyd Roberts			boyd@prl.dec.com

``Not only is UNIX dead, it's starting to smell really bad.''  -- Rob Pike

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Nov3.125655.16320@prl.dec.com>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!pa.dec.com!decprl!decprl!boyd

References: <Bx4Myp.Czr@unix.amherst.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell,comp.unix.questions
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!pa.dec.com!decprl!decprl!boyd
From: boyd@prl.dec.com (Boyd Roberts)
Subject: Re: Bourne Shell Programming Considered Harmful
Message-ID: <1992Nov3.125655.16320@prl.dec.com>
Sender: news@prl.dec.com (USENET News System)
Nntp-Posting-Host: prl313.prl.dec.com
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation - Paris Research Laboratory
References:  <Bx4Myp.Czr@unix.amherst.edu>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 1992 12:56:55 GMT
Lines: 10

Reply to Parent Message