"Modern" sh (was Math routines)

Article View: comp.unix.shell

Article #989

#989

From: Brian Glendenning
Date: Sun, 02 Sep 1990 21:24

16 lines
1237 bytes

All this reminds me of questions I've been meaning to ask:

1) Are there any versions of sh that don't understand # comments any
more?

2) How common are sh's that don't understand shell functions?

I'm particularly interested in the answer for machines that scientists
are apt to buy and use (so that old PDP-11 in your closet doesn't
count!)

Brian
--
       Brian Glendenning - National Radio Astronomy Observatory
bglenden@nrao.edu          bglenden@nrao.bitnet          (804) 296-0286

Technical Details

Message-ID: <BGLENDEN.90Sep2172441@mandrill.cv.nrao.edu>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!mcnc!uvaarpa!murdoch!murdoch.acc.virginia.edu!bglenden

References:

<26DC6447.15922@maccs.dcss.mcmaster.ca> <8446@orca.wv.tek.com> <SCOTT.90Aug30124930@tab00.larc.nasa.gov> <75@iconsys> <2494@uc.msc.umn.edu> <SCOTT.90Sep2141426@tab00.larc.nasa.gov>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!mcnc!uvaarpa!murdoch!murdoch.acc.virginia.edu!bglenden
From: bglenden@mandrill.cv.nrao.edu (Brian Glendenning)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell
Subject: "Modern" sh (was Math routines)
Summary: what is portable
Message-ID: <BGLENDEN.90Sep2172441@mandrill.cv.nrao.edu>
Date: 2 Sep 90 21:24:41 GMT
References: <26DC6447.15922@maccs.dcss.mcmaster.ca> <8446@orca.wv.tek.com>
 <SCOTT.90Aug30124930@tab00.larc.nasa.gov> <75@iconsys>
 <2494@uc.msc.umn.edu> <SCOTT.90Sep2141426@tab00.larc.nasa.gov>
Sender: news@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU
Organization: National Radio Astronomy Observatory
Lines: 16
In-Reply-To: scott@tab00.larc.nasa.gov's message of 2 Sep 90 18:14:26 GMT

Reply to Parent Message