🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.unix.sys5.r4
Article #779

Re: Raves about mailsurr

#779
From: david.e.wexelblat
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1993 17:11
55 lines
3517 bytes
[I should probably just keep my mouth shut, but...]

In article <id.IP9Y.PSI@ferranti.com> peter@ferranti.com (peter da silva) writes:
> In article <dan.731768031@dribble> dan@dribble.c-mols.siu.edu (Dan Ellison) writes:
> > In <id.8D8Y.OTL@ferranti.com> peter@ferranti.com (peter da silva) writes:
> > >In article <C3FHnE.C4s@chinet.chi.il.us> les@chinet.chi.il.us (Leslie Mikesell) writes:
> > >> Have you tried Smail3?  Compared to 2.5 it's a *big* clean package that's
> > >> still easy to configure and is easier to compile under sysV than sendmail.
> 
> > >When I can install it under Xenix-286 without putting more man-weeks into
> > >it than I'm willing to right now, I'll be delighted to give it a try. Right
> > >now a *small* package is a major advantage.
> 
> > Then again, sendmail and sendmail-IDA have already been ported....  You can
> > get ready to run versions of both for SCO UNIX on ftp.c-mols.siu.edu in
> > the sco-ports directory.
> 
> Um, Xenix-286 is neither Xenix-386, nor is it SCO UNIX. Porting today's
> highly VAXist software to the 286 is a challenge to weary Heracles, let
> alone a busy system administrator who's got enough on his plate with user
> requested ports.
> 
> This is without even bringing up little details like sendmail being a
> screaming horror from the sewers of hell.
> -- 
> Peter da Silva                                            `-_-'
> Ferranti International Controls Corporation                'U` 
> Sugar Land, TX  77487-5012 USA
> +1 713 274 5180                            "Zure otsoa besarkatu al duzu gaur?"

Peter, all of this started with you raving about mailsurr (the SVR4 mailer).
This is how the discussion has gone:

1) mailsurr is the greatest (Peter)
2) Well it can't do X,Y, and X.  Sendmail and smail3 can  (me and a couple 
   others).
3) Why would anyone want to runs sendmail (Peter)
4) They don't; run smail3, it's easier (me and a couple others)
5) When I can run it on Xenix-286, then talk to me (Peter)

Does anyone other than me find it incredibly bizarre that Peter is raving
in favor of a mailer that's ONLY available on SVR4, then tries to shoot
down other people's arguments for other MTA's because they don't run on
Xenix-286?

MAILSURR DOESN'T RUN ON XENIX EITHER.

this is sad...

--
David Wexelblat <dwex@mtgzfs3.att.com>  (908) 957-5871
AT&T Bell Laboratories, 200 Laurel Ave - 3F-428, Middletown, NJ  07748

"In and around the lake, mountains come out of the sky.  They stand there."
	-- Yes, Roundabout
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1993Mar11.171136.29689@cbnewsj.cb.att.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!network.ucsd.edu!pacbell.com!att-out!cbnewsj!dwex
References: <id.8D8Y.OTL@ferranti.com> <dan.731768031@dribble> <id.IP9Y.PSI@ferranti.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f4424,3ae24ce5dbfc4f90
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4424,public
X-Google-Thread: 1122ea,3ae24ce5dbfc4f90
X-Google-Attributes: gid1122ea,public
X-Google-Thread: f6a6c,3ae24ce5dbfc4f90
X-Google-Attributes: gidf6a6c,public
X-Google-Thread: 10c665,3ae24ce5dbfc4f90
X-Google-Attributes: gid10c665,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-03-11 10:11:48 PST
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sys5.r4,comp.unix.sys5.r3,comp.mail.misc,biz.sco.general
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!network.ucsd.edu!pacbell.com!att-out!cbnewsj!dwex
From: dwex@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (david.e.wexelblat)
Subject: Re: Raves about mailsurr
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1993 17:11:36 GMT
Message-ID: <1993Mar11.171136.29689@cbnewsj.cb.att.com>
References: <id.8D8Y.OTL@ferranti.com> <dan.731768031@dribble> <id.IP9Y.PSI@ferranti.com>
Lines: 55