🚀 go-pugleaf

palowoda@netcom.com (Bob Palowoda) writes:

>Fred Rump from home (fr@compu.com) wrote:
>: palowoda@netcom.com (Bob Palowoda) writes:
>: 
>: We sell such a system on the Altos 15000 using good old SCO MPX - it's fully 
>: symmetrical and runs just great. What's the problem? Does it have to be SUN?

>  Way way overpiced. Just not worth it. God I don't even want to develop
>  on SCO UNIX. They are never going to set any standards. There president
>  can't even keep his pants on. But that's marketing for you!

I agree.  MPX isn't worth running SCO.  I've seen several installations with
more than 100 users running ESIX SVR4.  Very fast -- with happy campers based
on real standards as defined in SVR4 -- not standards designed in Santa Cruz
to change an intended OS into something it wasn't designed to be (and compliers
that run "out of the box" on the majority of software circulating out there on
the net).

I wonder what kind of personal assets the stepped down president of SCO has 
available for taking -- as well as corporate assets for tolerating this type
of behavior..

Actually with todays activity on this subject, it is just plain STUPID for
SCO to tolerate this sort of activity from ANYONE, let alone the president.


-- 
Larry Snyder                                    internet: larry@gator.use.com
keeper of the Gator                                   uucp: uunet!gator!larry