Thread View: comp.unix.unixware
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by Tony Porczyk
Sun, 13 Feb 1994 20:29
Re: LINUX AND NETBSD SUCKS ROCKS!!!
Author: Tony Porczyk
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 1994 20:29
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 1994 20:29
56 lines
3182 bytes
3182 bytes
I normally don't like getting involved in religious discussions, but I couldn't let this one go by: Mr. Robert Glamm (glamm@rushmore.ee.umn.edu) writes: > Why would I want to put SCO on my system when linux does > everything BETTER than SCO does, and for free? Unfortunely, with that kind of empty exclamations, you lose all credibility before you even begin to discuss the issue. I run both Linux (latest Slackware) and SCO 3.2.4. Your statement is a pure hot air. >>#4. It's the other way around; you can't match Linux's tech support. Just > post to comp.os.linux.*, and you'll have 5 answers to your problem in > less than 20 minutes. I'd say that probably beats SCO. Nonsense. You may get that if you post something easy or if you get lucky. From my own experience: two to three answers after a few days (and I am very grateful to those that helped me because they don't get paid for it). In a production environment that is not an acceptable tech support by any stretch of the imagination. Considering how much money you can lose through downtime, paying for support suddenly seems like a really sweet deal. >#5. Cost efficient? Get real. Put SCO on 5 machines, it costs $5500. Put > linux on those same machines, it costs $0. You've saved yourself $5500. The most money is spent on consultants, maintenance and support. Cost of the OS is *negligable* in a production environment. > Besides, if you configure your hardware right, Linux will run much better > than SCO. There you go again, hot air, empty rethoric. Give some examples, will you? >#6. Linux takes less room than SCO. 'Nuff said. Now you really made me laugh. Since when was a few megabytes (okay, about 30) an issue in *any* production environment? Do you know what 30 MB cost these days? 20 minutes of a consultant's time. 'Nuff said. >#7. Basic SCO doesn't come with a development system. So? >#8. Linux uses a lot of GNU utilities. My girlfriend put SCO on her box, and > it didn't come with *SQUAT*. You couldn't do ANYTHING on her machine > worthwhile, period. You can't do ANYTHING worthwhile because it doesn't come with GNU tools? Try not to use that line when you go looking for a job, okay? t.
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads