Article View: comp.unix
Article #601Re: CIP (was Re: CGM<->PIC Translator)
From: Knudsen
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 1989 02:40
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 1989 02:40
10 lines
957 bytes
957 bytes
In article <284@sortac.UUCP>, pls@sortac.UUCP (Pat Sullivan) writes: > How / where can I find out more about CIP? > It sounds like it might make something we're doing easier. I use XCIP on my 630 (eXperimental CIP), which is presumably newer and more powerful. It's crashed on me only once; besides that it's pretty smooth. It should come with DMD Exptools. Perhaps someone else can comment on XCIP's improvements (or just differences) relative to CIP.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<930@altos86.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!apple!voder!pyramid!nsc!icldata!altnet!altos86!dtynanShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!apple!voder!pyramid!nsc!icldata!altnet!altos86!dtynan From: knudsen@ihlpl.ATT.COM (Knudsen) Newsgroups: comp.unix Subject: Re: CIP (was Re: CGM<->PIC Translator) Summary: XCIP is newer Keywords: CIP Message-ID: <930@altos86.UUCP> Date: 30 Mar 89 02:40:28 GMT Sender: dtynan@altos86.UUCP Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories - Naperville, Illinois Lines: 10 Approved: dtynan@zorba.Tynan.COM