Article View: comp.unix
Article #692Re: AIX, System V comparision
From: Robert C. White Jr.
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 1989 05:22
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 1989 05:22
24 lines
1407 bytes
1407 bytes
in article <1048@altos86.UUCP>, pa1900@ucsd.edu says: > Approved: dtynan@zorba.Tynan.COM > I will be using a PS/2 model 70 to run the OS's. Does anyone > have a suggestion as to which OS should be the System V > representative? I would think that if your were going to run stright IBM on the one hand, I would run stright AT&T on the other. Get a 386E from AT&T and put their SVR3.2 on it. That way you can claim stright from the source comparison... I don't knowhow they'll stack up. IF you are gonna review the packages do a sub-segment on "what you have to buy separately" with a disclamer about bundling by sub distributors. I would also be interested in the number/type of other-companies computers that will run the two packages or ports thereof. How much of a bitch is support. an "as advertised" check on promary features (like simultask and xenix compatibility or whatever IBM's equabilant are if any and vice versa.) n-stuff like that. Rob.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1072@altos86.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!purdue!decwrl!nsc!icldata!altos86!dtynanReferences:
<1048@altos86.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!purdue!decwrl!nsc!icldata!altos86!dtynan From: rwhite@nusdhub.UUCP (Robert C. White Jr.) Newsgroups: comp.unix Subject: Re: AIX, System V comparision Message-ID: <1072@altos86.UUCP> Date: 26 Apr 89 05:22:10 GMT References: <1048@altos86.UUCP> Sender: dtynan@altos86.UUCP Organization: National University, San Diego Lines: 24 Approved: dtynan@zorba.Tynan.COM