Re: System V IPC has no REMOVE_ON_EXIT bit

Article View: comp.unix

Article #709

#709

From: Bradley C. Spatz
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 1989 07:26

19 lines
1400 bytes

In article <1151@altos86.UUCP> clp@altos86.Altos.COM (Chuck L. Peterson) writes:
>
>Am I missing something incredibly obvious, or does System V
>IPC lack a bit which indicates that the shared memory, semaphore, or
>message should be removed automatically when my process exits?
>This would be an ultra-cool feature if I could ever figure out how
>to do it.

I know there is a SEM_UNDO bit used with the semop call, and I'm pretty
sure there are similar bits for message queues and shared memory, even 
though normal scheduling mechanisms might be sufficient for the latter.

Get a hold of a comprehensive reference for Sys V...
--
Bradley C. Spatz                               Internet:  bcs@beach.cis.ufl.edu
Computer and Information Sciences                BITNET:  spatz@uffsc.bitnet
College of Engineering
Univeristy of Florida               "School IS hell" -- Matt Groening

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1214@altos86.UUCP>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!apple!versatc!icldata!altos86!dtynan

References: <1151@altos86.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!apple!versatc!icldata!altos86!dtynan
From: bcs@beach.cis.ufl.edu (Bradley C. Spatz)
Newsgroups: comp.unix
Subject: Re: System V IPC has no REMOVE_ON_EXIT bit
Message-ID: <1214@altos86.UUCP>
Date: 12 Jun 89 07:26:50 GMT
References: <1151@altos86.UUCP>
Sender: dtynan@Altos.COM
Reply-To: uunet!beach.cis.ufl.edu!bcs ()
Organization: UF CIS Department
Lines: 19
Approved: dtynan@zorba.Tynan.COM

Reply to Parent Message