Article View: comp.virus
Article #3054Re: VCL? (PC)
From: Vesselin Bontchev
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 1992 14:59
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 1992 14:59
60 lines
3256 bytes
3256 bytes
hps@sdf.lonestar.org (Holt Sorenson) writes: > VCL is a Borland IDE based "Virus Creation Laboratory" that creates Don't blame Borland for what it not their fault. VCL is created with Borland's TurboVision, that's why it resembles to Borland's IDE. What you are saying seems to imply that Borland is somehow involved in the creation of this stupid piece of malware that is VCL. > poorly optimized, inefficient overwriting .COM and .EXE infectors. It creates buggy, usually not running, not optimized at all, stupid overwriting .COM infectors. Some of them can overwrite just all files (*.*), but this does not mean that they can correctly infect EXE files (i.e., without damaging them). It can also produce lame trojan horses. It also tries to produce companion viruses, but they don't work. > You can get ahold of it on most virus bbs's or from a virus writer or > an anti-virus buff who would trust you with it. If you understand The above is a totally unfounded flame against the honest anti-virus researchers. You have already posted it twice. If you have any facts, please speak up. But facts only, please. > Assembly it is possible to patch the code and create virii and some of > the code is sound enough to create a virus with. Compared to the You mean, if you are good enough in assembly language, you might find the bugs in the viruses that VCL generates and eventually fix them. I mean, fix the viruses, because you cannot fix the VCL program itself - it's too buggy for that. But why bother? Anybody who is able to fix those bugs should be able to write a virus himself, instead of using the stupid things that VCL generates... :-) > current technology available in the virus world it is outdated. It has already been outdated, when it has been released... :-) > Unfortunately, the author has promised to release a second version > which is supposed to have several improvements that will make it more Ah? Maybe he will be able to make a proper install program the next time... The current installation procedure is buggy. > fun for researchers to play with. I doubt it will create any serious > problems though. The release will probably be in January or Feruary of Of course, it doesn't create any serious problems. The only serious problem is the trend - it's much harder to deal with 2,000 virus creation tools than with 2,000 viruses... Fortunately, it is much harder to write a working virus creation tool than it is to create a working virus... Regards, Vesselin - -- Vesselin Vladimirov Bontchev Virus Test Center, University of Hamburg Tel.:+49-40-54715-224, Fax: +49-40-54715-226 Fachbereich Informatik - AGN < PGP 2.0 public key available on request. > Vogt-Koelln-Strasse 30, rm. 107 C e-mail: bontchev@fbihh.informatik.uni-hamburg.de D-2000 Hamburg 54, Germany
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<0007.9211091912.AA05064@barnabas.cert.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ukma!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!netnews.upenn.edu!netnews.cc.lehigh.edu!newsShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ukma!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!netnews.upenn.edu!netnews.cc.lehigh.edu!news From: bontchev@fbihh.informatik.uni-hamburg.de (Vesselin Bontchev) Newsgroups: comp.virus Subject: Re: VCL? (PC) Message-ID: <0007.9211091912.AA05064@barnabas.cert.org> Date: 2 Nov 92 14:59:11 GMT Sender: virus-l@lehigh.edu Lines: 60 Approved: news@netnews.cc.lehigh.edu