Article View: comp.virus
Article #4257Apologies to Padgett, and clarification (PC)
From: Tim Martin; FSO; Soil Sciences
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 19:20
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 19:20
24 lines
1643 bytes
1643 bytes
Reading over two of my recent posts, about the Monkey virus, I realize one could get the impression I am critical of Padgett Peterson's "Fixutils" and "Disk Secure" packages. Not at all! I still find Disk Secure to be the best, simplest, and cheapest software way I know of to protect against MBR infectors. That's why the University of Alberta uses it in all its "public access" DOS computer labs. And that, unfortunately, is why Monkey was written to by-pass Disk Secure. Far from a statement against Disk Secure, this is a lesson on the limitations of any software-based protection system: a directed attack, however unlikely, is always a possibility. Similarly FixMBR demonstates an interesting and straightforward way to recover from almost all MBR viruses. But not from Monkey, and presumably once again for the same reason. :) Tim. ------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Martin * Spatial Information Systems * "I really don't see how returning University of Alberta * the product helps me." martin@cs.ualberta.ca * -------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<0012.9211191448.AA21875@barnabas.cert.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ornl!rsg1.er.usgs.gov!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!ub!dsinc!netnews.upenn.edu!netnews.cc.lehigh.edu!newsShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ornl!rsg1.er.usgs.gov!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!ub!dsinc!netnews.upenn.edu!netnews.cc.lehigh.edu!news From: martin@cs.ualberta.ca (Tim Martin; FSO; Soil Sciences) Newsgroups: comp.virus Subject: Apologies to Padgett, and clarification (PC) Message-ID: <0012.9211191448.AA21875@barnabas.cert.org> Date: 17 Nov 92 19:20:55 GMT Sender: virus-l@lehigh.edu Lines: 24 Approved: news@netnews.cc.lehigh.edu