Article View: comp.virus
Article #4326Re: F-PROT and Stoned variant (PC)
From: Chip Seymour
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 15:18
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 15:18
17 lines
890 bytes
890 bytes
>From V5 #200: > We may have found a new variety of STONED on our campus. > F-Prot 2.06a identified it as a STONED virus but refused to > remove it. We've had three instances of the same problem here. In two cases FDISK /MBR corrected the problem with no adverse side-effects. The user in the third case is reluctant to run FDISK on a DOS 3.0 machine. Anyone know what'll happen if we do that? (The virus came from a local high school.) Chip Seymour Computervision Corp. Bedford MA
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<0003.9212171857.AA14855@barnabas.cert.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!cert!netnews.upenn.edu!netnews.cc.lehigh.edu!newsShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!cert!netnews.upenn.edu!netnews.cc.lehigh.edu!news From: CHIP@BDSO.Prime.COM (Chip Seymour) Newsgroups: comp.virus Subject: Re: F-PROT and Stoned variant (PC) Message-ID: <0003.9212171857.AA14855@barnabas.cert.org> Date: 15 Dec 92 15:18:29 GMT Sender: virus-l@lehigh.edu Lines: 17 Approved: news@netnews.cc.lehigh.edu