Article View: comp.virus
Article #4329Will the real MS-DOS 5.00 please stand up (PC)
From: A. Padgett Peterson
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 17:45
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 17:45
26 lines
1598 bytes
1598 bytes
The recent CHKDSK problem brings up the question "Just how many MS-DOS 5.00s are there are how can you tell ?" I must admit to having been buried in antiquity with my studies of antediluvian boot sectors but this controversy and the accompanying VER /R debacle brought this up. First, I am sure that by now everyone knows that no matter which version of MS-DOS 5.00 is booted (from the beta 5.00.409c (1990) to the beta 6.00.0015 (1992)), VER /R returns "Revision A". Just checking through my stuff I have found three different released versions of MS-DOS 5.00 dated 03-22-91, 04-09-91, and 11-11-91. All report simply MS-DOS 5.00 though various components are different (all COMMAND.COMs COMPare the same @ 47845 bytes & VER is an internal command). For completeness, I would like to know if there are any other MS-DOS 5.00s out there and is there any differentiation between them other than date (to spare the group, please reply privately to padgett@tccslr.dnet.mmc.com, I will post any interesting discoveries). Please only *real* Microsoft versions - I know of different DOS 5.0s from IBM, COMPAQ and ZENITH for example. Warmly, Padgett
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<0005.9212171857.AA14855@barnabas.cert.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!cert!netnews.upenn.edu!netnews.cc.lehigh.edu!newsShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!cert!netnews.upenn.edu!netnews.cc.lehigh.edu!news From: padgett@tccslr.dnet.mmc.com (A. Padgett Peterson) Newsgroups: comp.virus Subject: Will the real MS-DOS 5.00 please stand up (PC) Message-ID: <0005.9212171857.AA14855@barnabas.cert.org> Date: 15 Dec 92 17:45:57 GMT Sender: virus-l@lehigh.edu Lines: 26 Approved: news@netnews.cc.lehigh.edu