Article View: comp.virus
Article #4665Export restrictions on anti-virus software
From: robert heuman
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1993 19:43
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1993 19:43
41 lines
2630 bytes
2630 bytes
Date Entered: 01-14-93 13:33 aryeh@mcafee.com (McAfee Associates) posted part of the material re Export controls and then asked a question as follows: > Question: Does "In the public domain" mean a program that is not > copyrighted, e.g., "free" as in the context of "public domain" > software, or does it just mean a program is widely available to the > public, and thus not subject to export controls--even if it is > shareware, e.g, publicly-available but copyrighted? I asked the bureaucrats this same question, and was told it meant what it said, and that they would not define it any further - and would interpret it on a case by case basis.... however, they also said that something being widely available, or even imported electronically, did not mean a thing.... If it had a price attached to it, and was not marketed according to the strict interpretation they had for packaged software, it came under the rules. Therefore although I had 'imported' F-PROT electronically, I could not send it electronically to our offshore locations.... That would be a violation of the act. I know it is silly... you know it is silly (and unenforcable)... but that is the way THEY intrepret it, and THEY MUST be right, right? Even sillier was that I then asked that if I did apply for the export permit, could I export it electronically once the permit was obtained, and was told - NO! It had to go through Customs, with the permit attached, and couldn't if in a communication! (Of course they are correct - it can't, but who needs postal delays on time sensitive material?) I do not suggest that any of the rule makes sense - it doesn't in the context of either F-PROT or SCAN/CLEAN, etc. These posts are for everyone's information. However, I do ask if someone could check the latest rules for the US and other COCOM countries, and see if they have the equivalent. I suspect they do, and wonder how each bureaucracy would interpret this same issue. Bob - --- RoseReader 1.70 P001886: This Canadian has an Opinion...His Own! RoseMail 2.00 : RoseNet<=>Usenet Gateway : Rose Media 416-733-2285
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<0007.9301221631.AA12947@barnabas.cert.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!cert!netnews.upenn.edu!netnews.cc.lehigh.edu!newsShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!cert!netnews.upenn.edu!netnews.cc.lehigh.edu!news From: robert.heuman@rose.com (robert heuman) Newsgroups: comp.virus Subject: Export restrictions on anti-virus software Message-ID: <0007.9301221631.AA12947@barnabas.cert.org> Date: 14 Jan 93 19:43:47 GMT Sender: virus-l@lehigh.edu Lines: 41 Approved: news@netnews.cc.lehigh.edu