Article View: comp.virus
Article #4740Re: VSHIELD, VIRSTOP, ... comparison ? (PC)
From: David_Conrad
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 10:16
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 10:16
18 lines
1076 bytes
1076 bytes
In VIRUS-L v5i207 Nemrod_Kedem@f101.n9721.z9.virnet.bad.se (Nemrod Kedem) write s: > > 3) VShield uses much more memory than VirStop. > >But may be loaded to high memory, and then needs less then 1K of >conventional memory. Implying that Virstop cannot?! Virstop can be loaded high, and then requires no conventional memory. And still, VSHIELD will use more high memory that Virstop, reducing the number of other things you can have loaded high simultaneously. Even with loadhigh in DOS 5.0, smaller is still better when it comes to memory-resident programs. Regards, David R. Conrad David_Conrad@mts.cc.wayne.edu, dave@michigan.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<0006.9301051858.AA13030@barnabas.cert.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!cs.utexas.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!yale.edu!jvnc.net!netnews.upenn.edu!netnews.cc.lehigh.edu!newsShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!cs.utexas.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!yale.edu!jvnc.net!netnews.upenn.edu!netnews.cc.lehigh.edu!news From: David_Conrad@MTS.cc.Wayne.edu Newsgroups: comp.virus Subject: Re: VSHIELD, VIRSTOP, ... comparison ? (PC) Message-ID: <0006.9301051858.AA13030@barnabas.cert.org> Date: 23 Dec 92 10:16:52 GMT Sender: virus-l@lehigh.edu Lines: 18 Approved: news@netnews.cc.lehigh.edu