Article View: comp.virus
Article #4766Re: MS-DOS CHKDSK & VER /R (PC)
From: A. Padgett Peterson
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1993 20:50
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1993 20:50
22 lines
1256 bytes
1256 bytes
From: bill.lambdin%acc1bbs@ssr.com (Bill Lambdin) >Quoting from A. Padgett Peterson to All About MS-DOS CHKDSK & why VER / on >12-20-92 AP> Further, COMP finds no difference between this COMMAND.COM and the on AP> just expanded from a new set of distribution disks that is dated 11-1 >Just for your information, FC (File Compare) does a better job at >comparing files than COMP. Agree that FC produces a nicer (and unlimited length) output than COMP but it was designed to compare text files and you have to remember to use the /B switch on binaries or the check may terminate on the first <EOF> marker. COMP, on the other hand, uses no intelligence, is much faster, and has worked the same way in all DOS versions. I prefer COMP when all that matters is "are the files identical?". To each his/her/its own. Warmly, Padgett
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<0014.9301062041.AA14693@barnabas.cert.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!netnews.upenn.edu!netnews.cc.lehigh.edu!newsShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!netnews.upenn.edu!netnews.cc.lehigh.edu!news From: padgett@tccslr.dnet.mmc.com (A. Padgett Peterson) Newsgroups: comp.virus Subject: Re: MS-DOS CHKDSK & VER /R (PC) Message-ID: <0014.9301062041.AA14693@barnabas.cert.org> Date: 5 Jan 93 20:50:52 GMT Sender: virus-l@lehigh.edu Lines: 22 Approved: news@netnews.cc.lehigh.edu