Article View: comp.virus
Article #5143Checksums
From: IA88000
Date: Sun, 04 Feb 1990 18:56
Date: Sun, 04 Feb 1990 18:56
9 lines
792 bytes
792 bytes
This is an open question to anyone on the list who would care to answer. If you had your choice, which checksum routine would you consider most secure, and why. If you do not want to reply on the list but would rather reply by email, that's okay. To make the question a little more specific, of the checksum routines available today, which would you select.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<0001.9002071642.AA05334@ge.sei.cmu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think!snorkelwacker!mit-eddie!rutgers!netnews.upenn.edu!vax1.cc.lehigh.edu!sei.cmu.edu!krvwShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think!snorkelwacker!mit-eddie!rutgers!netnews.upenn.edu!vax1.cc.lehigh.edu!sei.cmu.edu!krvw From: IA88@PACE.BITNET (IA88000) Newsgroups: comp.virus Subject: Checksums Message-ID: <0001.9002071642.AA05334@ge.sei.cmu.edu> Date: 4 Feb 90 18:56:00 GMT Sender: Virus Discussion List <VIRUS-L@IBM1.CC.Lehigh.EDU> Lines: 9 Approved: krvw@sei.cmu.edu