Article View: comp.virus
Article #5224Many WDEF reports (Mac)
From: David.M..Chess
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1990 00:00
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1990 00:00
5 lines
770 bytes
770 bytes
Curious as to why we're seeing all these WDEF reports, and not similar numbers of reports of other widespread viruses. Has it just become a tradition to report WDEF on VIRUS-L, or is WDEF better at spreading? If the latter, does anyone have a good feeling for what about WDEF makes it so (um) virulent? DC
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<0005.9002132006.AA19225@ge.sei.cmu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!jarthur!polyslo!vlsi3b15!vax1.cc.lehigh.edu!sei.cmu.edu!krvwShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!jarthur!polyslo!vlsi3b15!vax1.cc.lehigh.edu!sei.cmu.edu!krvw From: CHESS@YKTVMV.BITNET (David.M..Chess) Newsgroups: comp.virus Subject: Many WDEF reports (Mac) Message-ID: <0005.9002132006.AA19225@ge.sei.cmu.edu> Date: 13 Feb 90 00:00:00 GMT Sender: Virus Discussion List <VIRUS-L@IBM1.CC.Lehigh.EDU> Lines: 5 Approved: krvw@sei.cmu.edu