🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

1 total messages Started by Vesselin Bontchev Wed, 04 Nov 1992 11:27
Re: SCAN 95b doesn't find MtE in EXE files (PC)
#3081
Author: Vesselin Bontchev
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 1992 11:27
65 lines
3009 bytes
Stefano_Turci@f0.n462.z9.virnet.bad.se (Stefano Turci) writes:

> I hope you'll be able to read this message, I never wrote in this area
> before.

You did fine; I was able to read your message. A very interesting one,
BTW!

> Do you know LZEXE ?

[stuff deleted]

> Well, I converted the files from COM to EXE, and made some scanning
> tests with the mentioned programs.

Ha, yes, indeed, that's interesting. It's similar to using PKLite or
LZEXE, or one of the dozen other compressors to hide the initial
infected file. Of course, all replicants will be detected correctly,
but if the dropper (because what you did is to create droppers) will
remain undetected and continue to spread the infection...

>     Gobbler 2.99 beta 5
>     TbScan 4.3

> got each infected file.

I find this hard to believe... Did you try Gobbler with unencrypted
replicants of CryptLab? Did you try TbScan with unencrypted replicants
of Fear? Those scanners are usually missing these viruses...

> I have personally tried to infect a COM file starting from a .EXE
> converted file and the infection was made correctly, that is the
> converted files are still able to propagate the virus, so I think the
> authors of the "missing-in- action" programs should improve their a-v
> packages. 8-)

I agree with you. There is no reason why scanners that claim to be
able to scan inside PKLited and LZEXEd files (and SCAN, F-Prot, and
VirX do claim to be able to do so; F-Prot even scans inside files
compressed with other compressors) should be unable to scan inside COM
files converted to EXE format...

> Well, I'm trying to write my own Mte detector.

If you do, we'll be glad to test it here.

> I run it on a high number of files infected with two Mte-based viruses
> ( Dedicated and Pogue) and it is able to detect all of the infected
> files, but how could I say if it will work for *EVERY* mutation and
> for *EVERY* Mte-based virus ?

> I think it's impossible.

You are right, it's impossible. That's why, our tests can only prove
that a scanner is NOT able to detect the MtE-based viruses reliably.
Otherwise we can only say that we have been unable to find an MtE
replicant that the scanner does not detect.

Regards,
Vesselin
- -- 
Vesselin Vladimirov Bontchev          Virus Test Center, University of Hamburg
Tel.:+49-40-54715-224, Fax: +49-40-54715-226      Fachbereich Informatik - AGN
< PGP 2.0 public key available on request. > Vogt-Koelln-Strasse 30, rm. 107 C
e-mail: bontchev@fbihh.informatik.uni-hamburg.de    D-2000 Hamburg 54, Germany
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads